[jsr-314-open] Request for Changes to 2.0 Final Artifact

Andy Schwartz andy.schwartz at oracle.com
Tue Jun 23 19:10:19 EDT 2009


Sure, +1.  And more importantly, welcome to 314 Lincoln!  Better late 
than never I guess. :-)

Andy

lincolnbaxter at gmail.com wrote:
> + 1
>
> :)
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
>
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:00:52 
> To: <jsr-314-open at jcp.org>
> Subject: Re: Request for Changes to 2.0 Final Artifact
>
>
> + 1
>
> On 23 Jun 2009, at 22:52, Roger Kitain wrote:
>
>   
>> Hello EG members,
>>
>> We seem to have overlooked the following critical issues in the  
>> specification, some of them brought to our attention based on your  
>> feedback.
>>
>> 1148: Numerous bugs in the PDL documentation
>> https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1148
>>
>> 570: Missing description field in javascript event payload
>> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=570
>>
>> 578: Change javascript payload "name" to "status"
>> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=578
>>
>> Since the JSF 2.0 final artifacts have not been pushed on the JCP  
>> site yet, we would like to use this opportunity to make these  
>> critical changes to the artifacts and then push it to the JCP  
>> website.  We would like to use this opportunity to fix these issues  
>> so that this is taken into effect in the EE 6 platform spec.
>>
>> More changes from your feedback and our analysis will come in an MR.  
>> Currently proposed changes for this MR can be found here:http://wiki.java.net/bin/view/Projects/Jsf2MR1ChangeLog 
>> .
>> The change log is still a work in progress as more issues have been  
>> conveyed by the EG, but have not yet been added to the log.
>>
>> Please confirm within 48 hours that is, close of your business day,  
>> Jun 25th if you approve these 3 changes.  Even one vote received  
>> against these changes will result in dropping this effort.
>>
>> Thanks you for your understanding.
>> Ed / Roger
>>     
>
>   





More information about the jsr-314-open-mirror mailing list