[jsr-314-open] [426-BeanValidation] Default Enablement Change

[Martin Marinschek]

Hi Ed,

if you ask for introduction of change 1, you should also ask for 2 - 1
without 2 doesn't make
much sense, right?

FWIW, for me Emmanuel's statement makes much sense - convention over
configuration, and a way to overrule convention by configuration is
all we should need!

regards,

Martin

On 3/10/09, Ed Burns <Ed.Burns at sun.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:41:16 -0800, Ed Burns <Ed.Burns at Sun.COM> said:
>
> EB> Change 1 Default default validator
> EB> Change 2 Default value for VALIDATE_EMPTY_FIELDS
> EB> Change 3 isDefault on @FacesValidator
>
> I have taken Change 1 to the EE architecture team to ask for guidance,
> since, as Emmanuel points out, our decision on this point is an
> opportunity to influence the programming model used for EE6.
>
> I'll let you know how it goes today.
>
> Ed
>
> --
> | ed.burns at sun.com  | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
> | homepage:         | http://ridingthecrest.com/
>
>


--

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces