[jsr-314-open] FacesServlet declaration in Java EE 6

[Martin Marinschek]

I would hope we take this in. However, we would probably have to
specify a default-name for the FacesServlet then, so that people can
override.

Also, is the postfix-mapping the way to go right now? With resource
handling, prefix mapping might be easier to pre-configure?

regards,

Martin

On 11/3/09, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com> wrote:
> I can't remember if this topic was ever resolved, but in an EE 6 container,
> will it be necessary to include the FacesServlet declaration in web.xml? I
> would assume that if the declaration is absent, but WEB-INF/faces-config.xml
> present, the declaration would be implicit and the mapping default to *.jsf.
> Is this something that could get resolved before EE 6 platform goes final?
> Think about it, when was the last time you declared the JspServlet?
>
> -Dan
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>


-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces