[jsr-314-open] jsf 2 evaluation and test

[Lincoln Baxter, III]

I read nearly the entire article, and I am almost convinced that this
(recurring) user response is due to a lack of centralized information, easy
to use quick start guides , and tutorials.

I do think there are a few things that we can take away from this. Like
community involvement, but that is a discussion I'm going to raise at
jsfsummit.

Lincoln Baxter III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
Keep it simple.

On Nov 17, 2009 8:23 AM, "Andy Schwartz" <andy.schwartz at oracle.com> wrote:

Nice timing Dan... I ran into the primary author (Sebastian) on the
exhibition floor at Devoxx.  We had a good discussion.  While Sebastian's
article does have its critical points and I don't necessarily share some of
the conclusions, it is clear that Sebastian has put a lot of effort into his
evaluation.  We have been encouraging the community to provide feedback... I
am looking at Sebastian's article as some thoughtful, seriously detailed
feedback.  Let's make the most of it.

Along those lines...  I asked Sebastian if he would be willing to meet again
with some of us from the EG while we are here and he was very open to that.
 We can talk over some of the concerns that Sebastian raised and see whether
we can translate these into action items for the EG.  (And if we have any
concerns over the content of the article - eg. any inaccurate statements -
we can certainly raise these - Sebastian is interested in hearing our
feedback as well.)

Andy

Dan Allen wrote: > > Here's a lengthy article summarizing an evaluation of
jsf 2 by the fellows at...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20091117/80007d18/attachment.html