[jsr-314-open] #{cc} semantics

[Dan Allen]

+1.

Also...


> 1. The user must recognize that the component in question is a composite
> component and code the expression differently.  While at the moment it is
> fairly easy to determine whether a particular component is a composite or
> not (by looking at the namespace declaration), I think that we should strive
> to blur these lines rather than reinforce them.


Exactly. We don't want the page author to start discriminating between the
implementations of a component. That's dangerous.

Leaving aside questions of how we might implement my preferred behavior for
> the moment...  Does anyone have comments on which behavior makes sense from
> a spec/end user perspective?
>
>
The general goal should be to make composite components as indistinguishable
from formal Java-developed components as possible.

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20090916/a9ce2624/attachment.html