[jsr-314-open] [jsf2next] PROJECT_STAGE system property configuration

[Dan Allen]

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On 8 Jan 2010, at 00:22, Jim Driscoll wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 1/7/10 12:27 PM, Dan Allen wrote:
> >> We need to make sure this request makes it out of the mailinglist and in
> >> front of the Java EE spec leads. Is there a formal way for one spec to
> >> propose and enhancement to another spec, other than submitting a JSR? We
> >> want to propose it in such a way that they understand that all of us
> >> that support it are pushing/voting for it.
> >
> > Well, besides Ed giving Roberto a call, I'm not aware of a formal
> process.
> >
> > But if folks here want it, the simplest way to ensure that it happens is
> for the EE EG rep from your company to push for it (hint to Dan) - it seems
> small enough that it should be contained inside the EE umbrella
> specification, and flow down to subordinate specs, rather than being a
> separate spec itself.
>
> As I understand it, if the JSF EG feels that this a feature that should be
> pushed to another spec, it is the responsibility of the spec lead to take
> this up. But rest assured if this doesn't happen, then we (Red Hat) can push
> this through other channels such as our Java EE EG rep :-)


..and to add another point, I guess it would be nice if those other specs
had an issue tracker like our where we could record these wishes.

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20100108/0ced0537/attachment.html