[jsr-314-open] Method signatures for event handlers

Kito Mann kito.mann at virtua.com
Mon Jan 25 11:34:07 EST 2010


>
> Given that, my take is that:
>
> 1. Our biggest risk of confusion would be to have the the spec be
> inconsistent between these cases.
> 2. The behavior specified for actionListener (event parameter is optional)
> is the preferred behavior.  (We intentionally added this behavior in 2.0).
> 3. The fact that Mojarra implements this behavior for f:event's listener
> attribute as well is a good thing (and probably intentional).
> 4. We should update the spec in our upcoming MR to clarify that the current
> behavior is by design.
>

Good points.

+1

>
> I have logged the following spec issue to track this:
>
> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=731
>
> Andy
>
>
>  The reason you want to make it so is to have a better unit testing story.
>>
>> Cay
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20100125/9c9d0b85/attachment.html 


More information about the jsr-314-open-mirror mailing list