[jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] [901-DeprecateTargetConcept]

Jakob Korherr jakob.korherr at gmail.com
Sun Oct 31 11:46:53 EDT 2010


Yes, "implements" seems to be perfect for actionSource,
editableValueHolder an valueHolder.

However, for facet or clientBehavior "insert" still fits best.

Regards,
Jakob

2010/10/29 Ed Burns <edward.burns at oracle.com>:
>>>>>> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:00:06 -0400, Andy Schwartz <andy.schwartz at oracle.com> said:
>
> AS> On 10/29/10 3:32 PM, Ed Burns wrote:
>>> If we're talking verbs here, I think an even better one is "exposes".
>>> The component implements the thing whether it's exposed or not.
>
> AS> I can see two different notions of "implements":
>
> AS> 1.  The <h:commandButton> implements the ActionSource(2) contract.
> AS> 2.  The <h:commandButton> provides the implementation of the action
> AS> source that is declared in the interface section of the composite component.
>
> AS> I think that "implementsActionSource" works well for #2.  I also like
> AS> how this name leverages nomenclature/concepts that are already present
> AS> in our composite component architecture.  We have "interface" and
> AS> "implementation" sections - "implementsActionSource" fits in nicely with
> AS> this model.
>
> Ok, then I can get behind "implements".
>
> Ed
>
> --
> | edward.burns at oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
> | homepage:               | http://ridingthecrest.com/
> |  8 work days until German Oracle User's Group Conference
>



-- 
Jakob Korherr

blog: http://www.jakobk.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
work: http://www.irian.at




More information about the jsr-314-open-mirror mailing list