[jsr-314-open] Pre-JCP filed draft of JSF 2.2 JSR

[Kito Mann]

Hello Ed,

Have you handed this over to the JCP yet?

There are a couple of other things I'd like to see:

* Integration of Facelets ResourceResolver with resource management system,
so that normal Facelet views can be packaged in libraries.
* Simplification of locale specification for resource libraries (already in
the issue tracker)
* Support for mapping a request directly to an action without specifying a
page first (more Struts-style); this may be possible with page actions.
---
Kito D. Mann | twitter: kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting
http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info | twitter:
jsfcentral
+1 203-404-4848 x3

See you at JAX and JSF Summit 2010 June 20-23rd in San Jose:
http://jaxconf.com/



On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Ed Burns <edward.burns at oracle.com> wrote:

> Hello Experts,
>
> We can continue the work we've been doing all along, but now we have a
> delivery vehicle defined: the JSF 2.2 JSR.
>
> The current draft of the JSR that Oracle plans to submit is at [1] and
> you can comment on it by following up to this email.  I'll do my best to
> roll the edits into the draft as we go.
>
> I'd like to hand this to JCP by the end of next week so please get your
> comments in by then.  Please know that the JSR document describes the
> goals of the JSR at a high level, and that the final product will not
> look exactly like what is outlined in a JSR.
>
> Also, I would like to know if your company would like to be listed as a
> supporter of the JSR when we submit it to the JCP.  For those of you who
> are individual members of this expert group, please let me know if you
> would like to be listed as an individual supporting the JSR.
>
> The long term plan for JSF evolution now is to do smaller JSRs, one
> after the other.  This one is scheduled to be done by end of CY 2011.
>
> This JSR includes a number of items to further flesh out the work we did
> in JSF 2.0 and 2.1, as well as many items to address requests from the
> community for additional functionality.
>
> We'll be forming a new expert group but we will be creating new mailing
> lists similar in spirit and function to what we're doing with
> jsr-314-open.  We will be doing these lists entirely on the java.net
> infrastructure.  I firmly believe the transparency for which Dan Allen
> has advocated will be achieved.
>
> Ed
>
> P.S. I blogged about it as well [2]
>
> [1]
> http://javaserverfaces-spec-public.java.net/nonav/proposals/JSF-2_2-draft.html
> [2]
> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/edburns/archive/2011/02/11/pre-jcp-filed-draft-jsf-22-jsr-available
>
> --
> | edward.burns at oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
> | homepage:               | http://ridingthecrest.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20110225/4f071f25/attachment-0002.html