+1<br><br>That is seriously broken.<br><br>-Dan<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Norbert Truchsess <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:norbert.truchsess@t-online.de">norbert.truchsess@t-online.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">100% agree<br>
<br>
Norbert<br>
<br>
Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2009, 13:48 -0700 schrieb Jim Driscoll:<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">> There's a bug filed against the spec, 550.<br>
><br>
> <a href="https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=550" target="_blank">https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=550</a><br>
><br>
> I also filed a separate bug on the issue, which I've just marked as a<br>
> duplicate.<br>
><br>
> To summarize the problem: Sometimes, you don't *want* the css link to<br>
> be media="screen", but that's what's currently required by the spec.<br>
><br>
> To fix this, we need to add an attribute to the outputStylesheet tag,<br>
> "media". Then specify that the media type is set to that attribute's<br>
> value, or unset if not specified.<br>
><br>
> I think this is example of JSF overspecifying - there was no reason to<br>
> specify media type of 'screen' in the output tag.<br>
><br>
> This is a small change, and there's good reason to view this as an<br>
> oversight in the 2.0 spec. As such, I'd like advocate placing this on<br>
> the errata list, and change the implementation immediately. Please<br>
> respond if you disagree.<br>
><br>
> Jim<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br><a href="http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan">http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan</a><br>