Now that I think more about it, there really is no harm, and plenty of benefits, in having both mapped, so +1 to both.<br><br>-Dan<br><br>p.s. In a way it's like having .jsp and .jspx mapped in JspServlet.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Kito Mann <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kito.mann@virtua.com">kito.mann@virtua.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:19 PM, David Geary <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:clarity.training@gmail.com" target="_blank">clarity.training@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
+1 from me as well, but shouldn't "should" be "must"?<br></blockquote></div><div><br>+1 for me for both mappings, and I agree with David -- "must" is preferred.<br> <br></div><div><div></div>
<div class="h5"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/11/4 Dan Allen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dan.j.allen@gmail.com" target="_blank">dan.j.allen@gmail.com</a>></span><div><div></div><div><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
"If the JSF container is used in a Servlet 3 (or newer) environment, it should register an implementation of ServletContainerInitializer (using Service Providers from the JAR file specification). The ServletContainerInitializer should register the FacesServlet, with a name of Faces Servlet, if an existing servlet is not yet registered with this name. Furthermore, a suffix mapping of *.jsf [and/or a prefix mapping of /faces/*] should be added"<br>
</blockquote></div><div><br>Well said. +1 from me.<br><font color="#888888"><br>-Dan<br clear="all"></font></div></div><div><div></div><div><br>-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>
Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div></div></div><br>
</blockquote></div></div></div><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>