<p>That makes sense, thanks.</p>
<p>Lincoln Baxter III<br>
<a href="http://ocpsoft.com">http://ocpsoft.com</a><br>
<a href="http://scrumshark.com">http://scrumshark.com</a><br>
Keep it simple.</p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">On Nov 13, 2009 4:35 PM, "Ed Burns" <<a href="mailto:Ed.Burns@sun.com">Ed.Burns@sun.com</a>> wrote:<br><br>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:13:46 -0500, "Lincoln Baxter, III" <<a href="mailto:lincolnbaxter@gmail.com">lincolnbaxter@gmail.com</a>> said:<br>
<br>
LB> "Maybe JBoss doesn't want an exclusively private list as one of the list<br>
LB> options, but I know Sun does. I'll leave it for other EG members to<br>
LB> respond"<br>
<br>
LB> Where does this leave people like me?<br>
<br>
Do you have a gigantic revenue stream that is impacted by decisions<br>
regarding your company's interaction with JCP? What I'm talking about<br>
here is stuff that lawyers tend to be interested in.<br>
<br>
Here's the guideline we've been using with jsr-314-open since it<br>
started.<br>
<br>
When you sit down to write an email to the EG, write to jsr-314-open<br>
unless any of the following are true:<br>
<br>
1. your employer's lawyers are likely to be interested in what you say<br>
<br>
2. you want to share only with official EG members. This might be when<br>
you want to share product plans that are not yet public knowledge.<br>
<br>
If any of the above are true, write to jsr-314-eg.<br>
<br>
We need to have this private option when writing to the list.<br>
<p><font color="#500050">
Ed
--
| <a href="mailto:ed.burns@sun.com">ed.burns@sun.com</a> | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
| homepage: | <a href="http://ridingthe.">http://ridingthe.</a>..</font></p></blockquote></p>