<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Pete Muir <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pmuir@redhat.com">pmuir@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
On 13 Nov 2009, at 22:07, Ed Burns wrote:<br>
<br>
> DA> And since we don't want a exclusively private list, that leaves us<br>
> DA> with <a href="mailto:jsr-314-observers@jcp.org">jsr-314-observers@jcp.org</a>.<br>
><br>
> Maybe JBoss doesn't want an exclusively private list as one of the list<br>
> options, but I know Sun does. I'll leave it for other EG members to<br>
> respond.<br>
<br>
</div>Red Hat understands that we need a private list for stuff like contractual discussions (and so does Dan now :-)<br>
<br>
Personally, I would prefer a private list to an ad-hoc email cc'd to people!<br></blockquote><div><br>Sorry that I had spoken in haste. The private list was just not on my radar for solving the community participation problem. Of course we can use it...and we can even switch to it today since the current configuration for <a href="mailto:jsr-314-eg@jcp.org">jsr-314-eg@jcp.org</a> is suitable. We just need to verify the proper people are subscribed.<br>
<br>-Dan<br></div></div><br>-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br>
<a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>