<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Jim Driscoll <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Jim.Driscoll@sun.com">Jim.Driscoll@sun.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On 12/10/09 11:30 PM, Ken Paulsen wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
* He doesn't like the standard components (i.e. panelGrid) -- Show of<br>
hands, who does? ;) Perhaps we're not stating loudly enough that our<br>
"standard" components are more like "example components". I think w/ JSF<br>
2's ease-of-component-creation, this is even less important... but even<br>
in 1.2 and earlier, we really don't expect the standard components to be<br>
production-components do we?? Apparently he does.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Um, well, I did too.<br></blockquote><div><br>As did I. Naturally, they look a little naked w/o styling, but still, the base components should be sufficient for doing something. I think you look at your app afterwords and say "man, this could really use some richness". Then you reach for libraries.<br>
<br>-Dan<br></div></div><br>-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br>
<a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>