<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:00 AM, David Geary <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:clarity.training@gmail.com">clarity.training@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 08ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
2009/12/15 Kito Mann <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kito.mann@virtua.com" target="_blank">kito.mann@virtua.com</a>></span><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
You know, that wasn't nearly as bad as I thought. I found the Spring vs Java EE thread pretty fascinating, actually. I'll have to tell Reza that :-).<br><br>I added a small post, but honestly, I felt like JSF 2 was represented pretty well, and not just by us.<br clear="all">
</blockquote></div><div><br>Yup, agreed. Quite a few folks were quick to defend JSF 2, and highlight how cool it is. Yet another verification that we're on the right track. Feels good.<br><font color="#888888"><br></font></div>
</div></blockquote><div>With that said, we do have to remember that we are approaching 6 months since the release of JSF 2 and moving towards an MR1 and JSF 2.1 is something we have to get serious about in the New Year. But the good will could turn south quickly ;)<br>
<br>Please enjoy your holidays, and make a New Year's resolution to help produce a JSF revision in a healthy time frame ;)<br><br>-Dan<br></div></div><br>-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>
Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>