Good point Jason. As the primary link, could you make it this link: <a href="http://java.sun.com/javaee/javaserverfaces/index.jsp">http://java.sun.com/javaee/javaserverfaces/index.jsp</a>. Then, just create a short section about the EG's dedication to openness and the creation of the <a href="http://www.javaserverfaces.org">www.javaserverfaces.org</a> root node. Because really, <a href="http://www.javaserverfaces.org">www.javaserverfaces.org</a> is something created by the EG rather than Sun, who really owns the technology definition (I guess).<br>
<br>-Dan <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Jason Lee <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jason@steeplesoft.com">jason@steeplesoft.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
>From the hip, I'm not sure The Powers That Be at Sun are going to like
the JSF Home Page point to <a href="http://javaserverfaces.org" target="_blank">javaserverfaces.org</a> and not the Sun page.
Not sure how best to handle that, though.<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 12/16/09 6:19 PM, Lincoln Baxter III wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
I've taken the liberty of updating the JSF page on <a href="http://enwikipedia.org/wiki/JavaServer_Faces" target="_blank">http://en.wikipediaorg/wiki/JavaServer_Faces</a>
<br>
<br>
I don't know how many of you have read it, but it was atrocious:
horrible grammar, entire paragraphs that added almost no value (or
should have been included in a section for "details nobody needs to
know,") and generally too much text that said too little.<br>
<br>
Notably, I removed the comparison to other frameworks because it was
rather uninformative (save the .net version) These features can be
pulled back in, if we deem them to be accurate and beneficial to the
audience (which on wikipedia, should be considered, "interested
academics and business researchers",) so such a comparison may be
valuable, but I assert that we should re-evaluate the manner in which
is it done. The focus should be on JSF, not the other frameworks. (This
section was almost as long as the rest of the article.)<br>
<br>
I've moved the focus from JSF1 to JSF2, while still keeping some
references to JSF1 functionality. JSF2 is the new standard, and I've
made that clear. <br>
<br>
Please feel free to add/update - it is our responsibility as the
experts to make sure that the correct knowledge is on here. My focus is
on clarity and understanding, but if someone more technical wants to
elaborate on anything I've done, or add new information, go ahead, and
I'll try to make sure it lays out well and flows intuitively.<br>
<br>
You can see all my changes here:<br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=JavaServer_Faces&action=historysubmit&diff=332153215&oldid=332141364" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=JavaServer_Faces&action=historysubmit&diff=332153215&oldid=332141364</a><br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<br>
---<br>
Lincoln Baxter, III<br>
<a href="http://ocpsoft.com" target="_blank">http://ocpsoft.com</a><br>
<a href="http://scrumshark.com" target="_blank">http://scrumshark.com</a><br>
"Keep it Simple" <br>
<br>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</div></div><font color="#888888"><pre cols="72">--
Jason Lee, SCJP
President, Oklahoma City Java Users Group
Senior Java Developer, Sun Microsystems
<a href="http://blogs.steeplesoft.com" target="_blank">http://blogs.steeplesoft.com</a></pre>
</font></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>