<p>Thanks for posting this Dan. Its been on my to do list, but as usual, you've summed up the points thoroughly and clearly. I am 100% on board with acknowledging / deprecating the jsf built-in managed bean facility in favor of a platform feature. IMO, jsf is crippled without a full DI container</p>
<p>+1</p>
<p>Lincoln Baxter III<br>
<a href="http://ocpsoft.com">http://ocpsoft.com</a><br>
<a href="http://scrumshark.com">http://scrumshark.com</a><br>
Keep it simple.</p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">On Dec 17, 2009 11:39 AM, "Dan Allen" <<a href="mailto:dan.j.allen@gmail.com">dan.j.allen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><p><font color="#500050">>
> Isn't it easier just to get started with JSF 2 along?
</font></p><div> ^ alone<br></div></div><p><font color="#500050">
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #2...</font></p></blockquote></p>