<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Dan Allen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dan.j.allen@gmail.com">dan.j.allen@gmailcom</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Cagatay Civici <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cagatay.civici@gmail.com" target="_blank">cagatay.civici@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Agreed as well, otherwise every library(Trinidad, PrimeFaces ...) needs to come up with it's own implementation which is the quick dirty workaround at the moment.<br></blockquote></div><div><br>If there are other APIs like MethodRule which are absolutely critical (meaning they are going to get duplicated right off the bat), please name them now or hold your peace until after rev a. We are looking for the absolutely critical here, because the goal is not to add a new features to JSF 2.0 but to fix what should be considered oversights.<br>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br>Subject to the group's and Ed's approval, of course.<br><br>-Dan<br></div></div><br>-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br>
<br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen">http://wwwgoogle.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>