Ok guys I posted an initial proposal in issue<br><br><a href="https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=774">https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=774</a><br>
<br>you also can download the proposal directly from <br><br><a href="http://people.apache.org/~werpu/Proposal%20Configuration.pdf">http://people.apache.org/~werpu/Proposal%20Configuration.pdf</a><br><br>It is just a proposal for 2 extension points first an extension point which gives read and write access to the configuration<br>
(although it is up to the implementation whether the right access is granted and in which state of the application)<br>Secondly system events all extensions and also the implementation must use as extension point<br>to get configuration write and read behavior in. This notification system uses the existing system events to perform that<br>
but more details in the PDF.<br><br>Btw. can someone please close <a href="https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=765">https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=765</a> since I cannot do it, it is oviously now covered by the proposal and the unload itself is part of a connecting extension framework or the respective implementation.<br>
<br>Werner<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Dan Allen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dan.j.allen@gmail.com">dan.j.allen@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Martin Marinschek <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mmarinschek@apache.org" target="_blank">mmarinschek@apache.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi guys,<br>
<br>
just so that I can add my 2cents as well: I believe it would be a<br>
valuable addition to JSF if we had some standardized hooks into the<br>
configuration management - that was really missing from the beginning.<br>
<br>
I believe it was also discussed from early on, but always delayed to a<br>
later version.<br></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>That later version needs to be JSF 2.1. Time to make it happen :)</div><div><br></div><font color="#888888"><div>-Dan</div><div><br></div></font></div><div><div></div>
<div class="h5">-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>
Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br>
<a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>