[keycloak-dev] M1 progress

[Stian Thorgersen]

I agree what you're proposing is better - I'll do it that way..

What's your thoughts on M1? Can we release to Maven on Friday?

Nice vid's btw :)

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 December, 2013 7:45:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] M1 progress
> 
> Being able to change an ID is not a good idea.  DB constraints et. al.
> -1.
> 
> Let's keep realm Name and ID in the data model, but just set the ID to
> be the name on creating.  But only for realms, not anything else please.
>   It should be possible to have same app names in different realms.
> 
> 
> On 12/4/2013 1:15 PM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> > Keycloak is looking pretty good now, and it looks like we're in good shape
> > to release M1 this week.
> >
> > One thing I don't like is the realms being looked up based on a generated
> > id. I really don't like urls being '../realms/32450982309/tokens/..'
> > instead of '../realms/myrealm/tokens/..'. We can easily fix this by
> > letting users set the id in the admin console. We should also display the
> > id throughout as well as the name. If there's no objections I'll sort this
> > out tomorrow.
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >
> 
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>