[keycloak-dev] Separate Maven for PicketLink and MongoDB

[Bill Burke]

Its a fallback plan if Picketlink IDM's performance/scalability isn't up 
to par.

On 9/20/2013 5:28 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
> I wonder why PicketLink IDM is viewed at par with MongoDB here.  Would
> it not be better if MongoDB Identity Store implementation was added to
> PicketLink and that was used?
>
> That way KeyCloak API could depend on PicketLink IDM API for file,
> ldap,DB,mongodb,cassandra,HDFS,HBase (and you name it) identity stores.
> I know we do not yet have implementations for identity stores for
> mongo,cassandra etc in PL yet.
>
>
> On 09/20/2013 06:45 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>> I propose that we move the adapters for PicketLink and MongoDB into separate Maven modules. IMO the code in services is already a bit crowded, and with the addition of a MongoDB implementation it will only get worse. If we add a SPI for these it would be easier in the future to add more. It would also be possible for users to write their own if they really need to.
>>
>> This will also make it possible for us to release M1 with either PicketLink or MongoDB even if the non-default implementation is not fully working at the time.
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com