[keycloak-dev] AS7 subsystem problems Re: release? Stan?

[Stan Silvert]

On 12/2/2014 2:49 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
> We should keep as7 adapter support at least.  We support older versions
> of Jetty and tomcat too, it would be strange not to support AS7.
> Hopefully stan has a fix.
>
> Looking at it, it looks like OperationDefinition is only within
> auth-server subsystem.  That could be the "hack' you're talkin about.
>
> Shouldn't the auth-server and adapter should be separate subsystems anyways?
They are seperated.  The auth-server runs from the subsystem.  The 
adapter is just an ordinary module.

I'm hoping this is just a naming issue that's easy to resolve.
>
> On 12/2/2014 2:37 PM, Marek Posolda wrote:
>> One slightly related issue. I just did some testing and figured that
>> eap6.3 and as7 distribution were broken as they excluded
>> keycloak-subsystem . I've fixed that and EAP 6.3 works fine now. But on
>> AS 7.1.1 the keycloak-subsystem doesn't work and I have:
>>
>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>> org.jboss.as.controller.OperationDefinition from [Module
>> "org.keycloak.keycloak-subsystem:main"
>>
>> I am seeing options like:
>> 1) Drop AS7 support
>> 2) Revert AS7 specific subsystem
>> 3) Do some hack in keycloak-subsystem to have it working on AS 7.1.1 (is
>> it doable?)
>>
>> Anything else I am missing?
>>
>> Marek
>>
>> On 2.12.2014 14:38, Bill Burke wrote:
>>> On 12/2/2014 7:55 AM, Stan Silvert wrote:
>>>> On 12/2/2014 4:52 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>>>> Should we upgrade to WF 8.2 and also do some changes to the distro
>>>>> before release?
>>>> I don't see a reason not to go to WF 8.2.  If we do that, let me know so
>>>> I can run a quick smoke test on the subsystem before we release.
>>>>> With regards to distro we should move the adapters and examples into
>>>>> separate downloads. Also, we should move the examples into a
>>>>> separate github project (keycloak/keycloak-examples). This will make
>>>>> it easier for those that wants to fork the examples separately.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, we should consider a download based on the web-lite profile.
>>>>> For non-JavaEE apps, containers (Docker) and those that want to run
>>>>> a standalone KC server it would be nice to have a small as possible
>>>>> distro.
>>>> Depending on how the feature pack turns out, we might be able to offer
>>>> many flavors of the appliance distro without any additional effort.  We
>>>> could have:
>>>> EAP6 + Keycloak
>>>> AS7 + Keycloak
>>>> WF8 (web) + Keycloak
>>>> WF8 (full) + Keycloak
>>>> WF 9 beta (web) + Keycloak
>>>> WF 9 beta (full) + Keycloak
>>>> etc.
>>>>
>>> IMO, we just need:
>>> * war-dist
>>> * appliance-dist
>>>
>>> Appliance distribution would have the most stable platform available.
>>> Since we can't distribute EAP, then it would be the most stable and
>>> maintained version of Wildfly that allows us to cluster and deploy
>>> Keycloak.
>>>
>>>