[keycloak-dev] Keycloak artifacts not in Maven Central

[Karel Piwko]

Correct, Maven Central is even simpler to use. Works ootb, no mangling with
settings.xml is required at all.

I asked for pushing RESTEasy to Maven Central in Nov 2011, needed for EAP6/WFK2.
There was the same clean up of pom.xml(s) back then.

Performance wise, I have no idea. I'm not experiencing any difference at all. If
you experience connection lags, you can always mirror Maven Central to a
different repo, such as JBoss Nexus -
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-mirror-settings.html.

Karel

On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:45:20 -0500 (EST)
Stian Thorgersen <stian at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hosting on Maven Central means that folks can use Keycloak artifaces without
> having to add JBoss Nexus to their poms. So IMO it makes it slightly simpler
> to add Keycloak deps.
> 
> RestEasy is on Maven Central
> (http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cresteasy) ;)
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> > To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Thursday, 30 January, 2014 1:37:47 PM
> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Keycloak artifacts not in Maven Central
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 1/30/2014 8:13 AM, Karel Piwko wrote:
> > > I did some checks and there is some work needed:
> > >
> > > 1/ According to Maven Central rules, there should not be any <repository>
> > > elements in pom.xml files
> > 
> > 
> > > 2/ When I removed them, org.jboss.web:jbossweb:jar:7.0.17.Final is not
> > > available no Maven Central
> > >
> > > So, following steps are needed:
> > >
> > > * figure out whether jbossweb dependency could be replaced by something
> > > else,
> > >    if not - it has to undergo same checks as keycloak and be synced to
> > >    Maven
> > >    Central or, which I prefer, to release it relocated to org.keycloak
> > >    groupId.
> > >    Given that 7.0.17.Final has do external dependencies at all -
> > >    seems much easier then trying to convince sonatype to pick a single
> > >    version
> > >    of jbossweb tree
> > > * remove all <repositories> from pom.xml files
> > >
> > 
> > Would hosting at Maven Central require developers to configure their
> > settings.xml, or can the build still run OOTB?  A build running OOTB is
> > more important than hosting at Maven Central.
> > 
> > Also, what is the performance of Maven Central compared to
> > repository.jboss.org?  I've often had slow as balls connections to Maven
> > Central and never any problems with repository.jboss.org.  Finally,
> > nobody has ever complained that Resteasy is not at Maven central.
> > People have no problems using repository.jboss.org so I don't see what
> > the big deal is.
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Bill Burke
> > JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> > http://bill.burkecentral.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev