[keycloak-dev] security proxy prototype

[Stan Silvert]

On 11/21/2014 8:48 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>
> On 11/21/2014 8:25 AM, Stan Silvert wrote:
>>> As a side effect, we now have a pure Undertow adapter.
>> I thought I already refactored our Undertow adapter to be pure?
>>
> I didn't see an adapter.  Just abstract classes.
>
Ah, you are right.  I got rid of the dependency on the Servlet API but I 
never provided a concrete extension of UndertowKeycloakAuthMech.

I've actually got one on my local box.  Should I add it to the Undertow 
adapter?