[keycloak-dev] security proxy prototype

[Pedro Igor Silva]

Bill,

   Is not that similar with PicketLink's Http Security [1] ?

   Of course, your work is providing that from outside the app. While in PicketLink you need the configuration in your app. But that can be easily changed.

[1] http://docs.jboss.org/picketlink/2/latest/reference/html-single/#chap-Http_Security

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 1:58:10 PM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] security proxy prototype



On 11/21/2014 10:35 AM, Stan Silvert wrote:
> On 11/21/2014 8:48 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>
>> On 11/21/2014 8:25 AM, Stan Silvert wrote:
>>>> As a side effect, we now have a pure Undertow adapter.
>>> I thought I already refactored our Undertow adapter to be pure?
>>>
>> I didn't see an adapter.  Just abstract classes.
>>
> Ah, you are right.  I got rid of the dependency on the Servlet API but I
> never provided a concrete extension of UndertowKeycloakAuthMech.
>
> I've actually got one on my local box.  Should I add it to the Undertow
> adapter?

I already did it and already use it in the proxy.


-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev