[keycloak-dev] scope and client templates

Stian Thorgersen sthorger at redhat.com
Thu Dec 17 10:47:50 EST 2015


I don't have a strong disagreement to adding it. Just wondering whether
it's really needed. If you guys think it's going to be used, let's add it.

On 17 December 2015 at 14:54, Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 12/17/2015 8:47 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 17 December 2015 at 14:39, Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com
>> <mailto:bburke at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     I don't think you've thought this through.  Of course you would want
>>     scope on a client template.
>>
>>     Client Template allows scope for Service A, Service B, and Service C.
>>
>>     Client 1, Client 2, and Client 3 all need to access Service A, B,
>>     and C.  You'd have to define scope in each client when it would be
>>     easier to define it in the client template.
>>
>>
>> I have thought it through - I just think that it's a lot more likely
>> that Client 1 will invoke Service A, Client 2 will invoke Service B.
>> Even if all clients invoke all services they will not have the same
>> scope, but different scope.
>>
>>
> An argument of "I don't think people will use this" is just as valid as my
> argument that I think people will want to use it.  The template would
> define the scope that is shared between multiple clients, then each client
> would add their own additional scope for the other services they need to
> use.
>
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20151217/f523bac8/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list