[keycloak-dev] 1.2.beta1 planning, need you to defer things

Stian Thorgersen stian at redhat.com
Thu Mar 12 05:51:54 EDT 2015



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marek Posolda" <mposolda at redhat.com>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>, "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> Cc: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, 12 March, 2015 10:48:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] 1.2.beta1 planning, need you to defer things
> 
> On 12.3.2015 06:40, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> > I'd like to reopen KEYCLOAK-311 as IMO it's not solved. This is not
> > referring to the claim mapping work you've done, it's something else.
> >
> > Before we can do a release we need to make sure that database migration
> > works (I know they don't atm as social providers and social links are
> > lost). We also need to add transformation of JSON exports and
> > representations so older versions can be imported into 1.2.0.Beta1.
> I did migration of social stuff for Mongo but not for jpa/liquibase
> though. I guess migration of protocol mappers would be needed too? As in
> 1.1.0.Final accessToken automatically has all the basic claims like
> username, email etc. So when people migrate to 1.2.0.Beta1, they would
> expect the same, which means that default builtin mappers for basic
> claims will need to be added for all the existing clients?

+1 Can you create a jira so we don't forget?

> 
> I have also some fear if export/import would work well together with
> protocol mappers. During import of previously exported application, the
> import shouldn't try to add all default mappers, but just those which
> were previously exported. Currently import invokes
> realm.addApplication(), which will trigger listeners for adding all
> default builtin mappers. I did not test it yet, but my bet is that it
> won't work well atm...

+1 Can you test and jira please?

> 
> Marek
> >
> > With all the changes we've done for this release (modules, claim mapping,
> > identity brokering, oidc endpoints, ...) we need to do more testing this
> > time around!
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> >> To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> Sent: Wednesday, 11 March, 2015 8:06:04 PM
> >> Subject: [keycloak-dev] 1.2.beta1 planning, need you to defer things
> >>
> >> I'd like to do 1.2.beta1 by end of month or earlier.  Please go through
> >> the jira list and defer things you are not going to get to in the next
> >> 1-2 weeks.  Thanks.
> > Done
> >
> >> I'm going to try and close existing bugs and implement features needed
> >> for jboss.org guys over the next 2 weeks as well as test out master to
> >> make sure things still work.
> > With regards to jboss.org guys we shouldn't just add features because they
> > request it. Take for example KEYCLOAK-1045, which was easily solved with
> > we already have. Another one is KEYCLOAK-1051, which I think is a horrible
> > idea.
> >
> >> Bill
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bill Burke
> >> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> >> http://bill.burkecentral.com
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> keycloak-dev mailing list
> >> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> 
> 


More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list