[keycloak-dev] Import proposal

Stian Thorgersen sthorger at redhat.com
Wed Nov 11 03:01:38 EST 2015


On 10 November 2015 at 16:11, Marek Posolda <mposolda at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 09/11/15 14:09, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9 November 2015 at 13:35, Sebastien Blanc < <sblanc at redhat.com>
> sblanc at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> That would be really nice indeed !
>> But are the markers files not enough, instead of also having a table in
>> the DB ?
>>
>
> We need a way to prevent multiple nodes in a cluster to import the same
> file. For example on Kerberos you end up spinning up multiple instances of
> the same Docker image.
>
> I bet you meant 'Kubernetes' :-)
>

Yup


>
>
> +1 for the improvements. Besides those I think that earlier or later, we
> will need to solve long-running export+import where you want to import
> 100.000 users.
>

+1


>
> As I mentioned in another mail few weeks ago, we can have:
>
> 1) Table with the progress (51.000 users already imported, around 49.000
> remaining etc.)
>

We would still need to split into multiple files in either case. Having a
single json file with 100K users is probably not going to perform very
well. So what I proposed would actually work for long-running import as
well. If each file has a manageable amount of users (say ~5 min to import)
then each file will be marked as imported or failed. At least for now I
don't think we should do smaller batches than one file. As long as one file
is imported within the same TX then it's an all or nothing import.


> 2) Concurrency and dividing the work among cluster nodes (Node1 will
> import 50.000 users and node2 another 50.000 users)
>

This would be solved as well. Each node picks up a file that's not
processed yet. Marks it in the DB and then gets to process it.


> 3) Failover (Import won't be completely broken if cluster node crashes
> after import 90.000, but can continue on other cluster nodes)
>
> I think the stuff I did recently for pre-loading offline sessions at
> startup could be reused for this stuff too and it can handle (2) and (3) .
> Also it can handle parallel import triggered from more cluster nodes.
>
> For example: currently if you trigger kubernetes with 2 cluster nodes,
> both nodes will start to import same file at the same time because import
> triggered by node1 is not yet finished before node2 is started, so there is
> not yet existing DB record that file is already imported. With the stuff I
> did, just the coordinator (node1) will start the import . Node2 will wait
> until import triggered by node1 is finished, but at the same time it can
> "help" to import some users (pages) if coordinator asks him to do so. This
> impl is based on infinispan distributed executor service
> http://infinispan.org/docs/5.3.x/user_guide/user_guide.html#_distributed_execution_framework
> .
>

The DB record needs to be created before a node tries to import it,
including a timestamp when it started the import. It should then be updated
once the import is completed, with the result. Using the distributed
execution framework sounds like a good idea though. How do you prevent
scheduling the same job multiple times? For example if all nodes on startup
scan the import folder and simply import everything they find, then there
will be multiple of the same job. Not really a big deal as the first thing
the job should do is check if there's a record in the DB already.


>
>
> Marek
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Stian Thorgersen < <sthorger at redhat.com>
>> sthorger at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Currently we support importing a complete realm definition using the
>>> import/export feature. Issues with the current approach is:
>>>
>>> * Only complete realm - not possible to add to an existing realm
>>> * No good feedback if import was successful or not
>>> * Use of system properties to initiate the import is not very user
>>> friendly
>>> * Not very elegant for provisioning. For example a Docker image that
>>> want's to bundle some initial setup ends up always running the import of a
>>> realm, which is skipped if realm exists
>>>
>>> To solve this I've come up with the following proposal:
>>>
>>> Allow dropping representations to be imported into 'standalone/import'.
>>> This should support creating a new realm as well as importing into an
>>> existing realm. When importing into an existing realm we will have an
>>> import strategy that is used to configure what happens if a resource exists
>>> (user, role, identity provider, user federtation provider). The import
>>> strategies are:
>>>
>>> * Skip - existing resources are skipped,
>>> * Fail - if any resource exists nothing is imported
>>> * Overwrite - any existing resources are deleted.
>>>
>>> The directory will be scanned at startup, but there will also be an
>>> option to monitor this directory at runtime.
>>>
>>> To prevent a file being imported multiple times (also to make sure only
>>> one node in a cluster imports) we will have a table in the database that
>>> contains what files was imported, from what node, date and result
>>> (including a list of what resources where imported, which was not, and
>>> stack trace if applicable). The primary key will be the checksum of the
>>> file. We will also add marker files (<json file>.imported or <json
>>> file>.failed). The contents of the marker files will be a json object with
>>> date imported, outcome (including stack trace if applicable) as well as a
>>> complete list of what resources was successfully imported, what where not.
>>>
>>> The files will also allow resolving system properties and environment
>>> variables. For example:
>>>
>>> {
>>>     "secret": "${env.MYCLIENT_SECRET}"
>>> }
>>>
>>> This will be very convenient for example with Docker as it would be very
>>> easy to create a Docker image that extends ours to add a few clients and
>>> users.
>>>
>>> It will also be convenient for examples as it will make it possible to
>>> add the required clients and users to an existing realm.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing listkeycloak-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20151111/2fafa1e3/attachment.html 


More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list