[keycloak-dev] i18n for examples

[Stian Thorgersen]

Why would we need i18n/l10n for examples? We don't provide
internationalization of applications themselves.

On 15 September 2015 at 10:02, Boleslaw Dawidowicz <bdawidow at redhat.com>
wrote:

> I would rather keep them simple.
>
> We would consider a single bigger and more complex one - then it would fit.
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stan Silvert <ssilvert at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Wondering...
> >
> > Will we need to do i18n/l10n for the examples?
> >
> > Do we want to upgrade angular for the examples that us it?  Right now,
> > they are still using AngularJS 1.2 while the admin console uses 1.4.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Bolesław Dawidowicz
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20150915/1b3b01a2/attachment.html