[keycloak-dev] in-memory users

Bill Burke bburke at redhat.com
Mon Feb 1 09:59:05 EST 2016


I agree on delay.  Just wanted to archive the thoughts just in case it 
becomes an issue for deployments like Openstack that are running 
Keycloak in front of openipa or Red Hat IT.

On 2/1/2016 9:52 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> There's no chance we have time for this now. 1.9.0.CR1 is due on 17th 
> Feb and we still have 48 unresolved issues. After that it's bug fixing 
> only.
>
> We can do this properly in 2.x don't you think?
>
> On 1 February 2016 at 15:45, Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com 
> <mailto:bburke at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     This used to be on the priority list, but we dropped it.  Just thought
>     of a better way to support this.  Just write an Infinispan model
>     provider and turn off user caching.  Sessions would store a URI to the
>     user and use that to locate the user if it is not in storage. 
>     Might be
>     relatively simple to implement.
>
>     --
>     Bill Burke
>     JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>     http://bill.burkecentral.com
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     keycloak-dev mailing list
>     keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20160201/bcad778a/attachment.html 


More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list