[keycloak-dev] i18n for Logging

Stan Silvert ssilvert at redhat.com
Mon Jan 18 09:56:25 EST 2016


On 1/18/2016 8:25 AM, Stan Silvert wrote:
> On 1/18/2016 3:02 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>> Looks good how you've done it.
>>
>> Bill is currently working on re-organizing code, but he's not going 
>> to move anything from services. So can you finish up services and 
>> send a PR for it? Then you can do the other logging once Bill is 
>> completed.
> Assuming nobody has an objection to the proposed format, I'll go ahead 
> and finish services.

Another thing to consider is DEBUG logging.  Do we want to localize 
debug messages?


>
>>
>> On 15 January 2016 at 22:12, Stan Silvert <ssilvert at redhat.com 
>> <mailto:ssilvert at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     I've completed a first stab at this using the JBoss logging
>>     tools.  Once merged we will have the ability to do i18n/l10n on
>>     our log messages and also use message numbers.
>>
>>     Here is the commit to show you how it turns out converting the
>>     log messages in KeycloakApplication:
>>     https://github.com/ssilvert/keycloak/commit/54faba37cb4797fc337569899d8ac8eaa7f0ad1a#diff-72ce0a0a72ebd57f8627c059f7f1ea03R1
>>
>>     So, now a message coming from the KeycloakApplication class in
>>     the services module looks like this:
>>
>>     15:29:31,515 INFO  [*org.keycloak.services*] (ServerService
>>     Thread Pool -- 50)*KC-SERVICES0001*: Loading config from
>>     c:\GitHub\keycloak\distribution\server-dist\target\keycloak-1.9.0.CR1-SNAPSHOT\standalone\configuration\keycloak-server.json
>>
>>     We need to decide how we want to structure this.  In WildFly, we
>>     typically have one logger per maven module. If you want to have
>>     one logger per package then you would need to create a new
>>     interface in each package, which gets hairy.
>>
>>     I do suggest that we prefix all of our messages with "KC-" or
>>     something else that is unique across products. Also, we should
>>     standardize the "padding" for the message numbers.
>>
>>     Another possibility is to have all keycloak messages start with
>>     "KEYCLOAK".  This would mean that we would need for each module
>>     to reserve a number range.  There are annotations to enforce this
>>     if we want to go that route.  The downside is that somewhere we
>>     need to maintain a registry.  I think WildFly did this but
>>     eventually abandoned it.  Notice that WildFly messages are like
>>     "WFLYUT" for Undertow or "WFLYJSF" for JSF.
>>
>>     BTW, localization works nicely.  Just add a bundle for a new
>>     language.  The tool even creates a skeleton properties file for you.
>>
>>     If you want more details on the i18n framework, see
>>     https://developer.jboss.org/wiki/JBossLoggingTooling.
>>
>>     Stan
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     keycloak-dev mailing list
>>     keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20160118/c06b9a60/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list