[keycloak-dev] Keycloak Node.js adapter integration tests on Travis

[Stian Thorgersen]

I agree it should test with something at least close to master. Question is
should all the repos build Keycloak themselves?

We could have Docker images automatically built/hosted on Docker hub?
There's already a nightly (seems to be broken atm, but that's fixable).
That may be more efficient than building, especially considering Maven
dependencies.

On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 14:13, Sebastien Blanc <sblanc at redhat.com> wrote:

> +1 , we should always rely on master.
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Good morning,
> >
> > Last week Pedro submitted a PR to the Node.js adapter, but the build is
> > failing because it depends on the changes from Keycloak server master
> > branch.
> >
> > Today we download the latest stable release from Keycloak to run the
> > integration tests for this adapter. I would like to change it and follow
> > the same approach from the Quickstarts, which means clone/build/run
> > Keycloak server from master. In this way, we can always it test against
> > the latest changes.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > abstractj
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>