<div dir="ltr">Should we not have one client for the roles that represents the services (bearer-only), then have a separate clients for admin GUI and CLI?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 7 December 2015 at 09:34, Marek Posolda <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mposolda@redhat.com" target="_blank">mposolda@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 03/12/15 20:06, Bill Burke wrote:<br>
> * We can remove the realm-management client in each realm and just merge<br>
> the roles into security-admin-console.<br>
</span>Not sure about this one TBH. Also in 1.7 we introduced the "admin-cli"<br>
client, which is used for direct-grants and has scope to<br>
realm-management similarly like security-admin-console. The<br>
security-admin-console is used for UI of admin console (javascript<br>
client) when admin-cli is used for direct access to admin REST endpoints<br>
for example from admin-client.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Marek<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
keycloak-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org">keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>