<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 11 March 2016 at 15:29, Bill Burke <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bburke@redhat.com" target="_blank">bburke@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=""><br>
<br>
On 3/11/2016 9:12 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
In summary all I ask is squash commits and include KEYCLOAK-XXXX in the commit message.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
That's all I needed to hear, not some long drawn out discussion on the way GIT history should look and the GIT command tribal dance to get it to look that particular way. I don't understand people's fascination with something that is rarely looked at by a very small subset of people that we can probably count on one hand. I've seen the same mind numbing, anal retentive, discussions on Wildfly, hibernate, and core lists too.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I blame the day of the week - I tend to get more caught up in discussions on a Friday ;)</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
-- <br>
Bill Burke<br>
JBoss, a division of Red Hat<br>
<a href="http://bill.burkecentral.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://bill.burkecentral.com</a><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>