<p dir="ltr">My vote goes to keep. In the future we should add batch operations for users and one thing we could support is remove identity provider links.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 21 Mar 2016 5:39 p.m., "Marek Posolda" <<a href="mailto:mposolda@redhat.com">mposolda@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Currently when identity (social) provider is removed, the federated<br>
links on linked users are not removed. It means that we may end with<br>
user records in DB, which are linked to non-existent identity provider.<br>
<br>
On the other hand, the advantage of current behaviour is, that when<br>
admin user accidentally removes facebook provider and then he decides to<br>
add it back (or just use another clientId/clientSecret or change<br>
configuration) the facebook links of users are still alive.<br>
<br>
So should we remove the links or rather keep as it is and not remove them?<br>
<br>
Marek<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
keycloak-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org">keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>