<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Wait! Maybe we should just merge adapter-spi and
adapter-spi-public. Its not that big a deal to have adapter-spi be
public.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/13/2016 12:10 PM, Marek Posolda
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:570E6F61.1050200@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
Found that fuse adapter doesn't work due to adapters packaging
changes. JIRA is here: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-2816">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-2816</a><br>
<br>
Among some minor things, the biggest issue is that osgi doesn't
work properly if there are 2 modules with classes inside same
package. There is "adapter-spi" and "adapter-spi-public" modules
with both having classes inside package
"org.keycloak.adapters.spi". So the easiest solution was just to
rename the package. <br>
<br>
There was possibility to rename either:<br>
(1) the one inside "adapter-spi" <br>
(2) or the one inside "adapter-spi-public" .<br>
<br>
I've actually chose the (1) and renamed the one inside
"adapter-spi" to "org.keycloak.adapters.<span
style="background-color:#e4e4ff;">spi</span>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
.internal". Only reason is that there might be some users, who are
using classes AuthenticationError or LogoutError, so they don't
need to change the code of their applications because upgrade. On
the other hand the (2) (rename the package inside
"adapter-spi-public" to "org.keycloak.adapters.spi.public" and
keep the one inside "adapter-spi" unrenamed) have the advantage of
better consistency among module names and package names. So if you
rather want me to go this way, let me know and I can change it.<br>
<br>
For now, the PR against 1.9.x for path1 is here: <a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/2614"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/2614">https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/2614</a></a>
. There are 72 affected files because of package renamed, but all
of them are inside adapters. Will send PR against master too if
you agree with the path1. Not sure if we rather need to retest all
the examples because of the change... <span class="moz-smiley-s2"><span>
:-( </span></span><br>
<br>
Marek<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org">keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://bill.burkecentral.com">http://bill.burkecentral.com</a></pre>
</body>
</html>