<div dir="ltr">Thanks</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 24 May 2016 at 11:44, Bruno Oliveira <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bruno@abstractj.org" target="_blank">bruno@abstractj.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">+1 Jira created: <a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-3030" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-3030</a><br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
On 2016-05-24, Stian Thorgersen wrote:<br>
> It's a bit confusing, but Keycloak server is still technically a war under<br>
> the covers, that's why setting it like that works. I wonder if we could<br>
> just rename the war to drop the war extension and then it would just be<br>
> "keycloak-server" and we could remove all the talk about war and name<br>
> changes.<br>
><br>
> On 24 May 2016 at 10:53, Bruno Oliveira <<a href="mailto:bruno@abstractj.org">bruno@abstractj.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > Because today we no longer distribute/deploy war files to get Keycloak up<br>
> > and<br>
> > running, but I can be wrong and totally missing the point here. Also, I<br>
> > couldn't<br>
> > find any reference at the docs to deploy that WAR, or generate it with<br>
> > -Pdistribution.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On 2016-05-24, Stian Thorgersen wrote:<br>
> > > We're completely redoing the docs at the moment.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Why do you say that section is not valid, at a quick glance it looks ok<br>
> > to<br>
> > > me.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > On 23 May 2016 at 22:10, Bruno Oliveira <<a href="mailto:bruno@abstractj.org">bruno@abstractj.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> > ><br>
> > > > Ahoy, I was looking at 3.4 section from our docs (<br>
> > > ><br>
> > <a href="https://keycloak.github.io/docs/userguide/keycloak-server/html/server-installation.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://keycloak.github.io/docs/userguide/keycloak-server/html/server-installation.html</a><br>
> > ).<br>
> > > > I believe this section is no longer valid, right?<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > If yes, I'm planning to remove it or should we replace with some<br>
> > > > alternative?<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > --<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > abstractj<br>
> > > > PGP: 0x84DC9914<br>
> > > > _______________________________________________<br>
> > > > keycloak-dev mailing list<br>
> > > > <a href="mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org">keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
> > > > <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev</a><br>
> > > ><br>
> ><br>
> > --<br>
> ><br>
> > abstractj<br>
> > PGP: 0x84DC9914<br>
> ><br>
<br>
</div></div>--<br>
<br>
abstractj<br>
PGP: 0x84DC9914<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>