<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">We discussed some time ago how to
ensure that UserFederationProvider lifecycle is properly tight to
KeycloakSession
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/2016-April/007123.html">http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/2016-April/007123.html</a>
. The last we discussed was to add new method on KeycloakSession
like:<br>
<br>
<T extends Provider> T getProvider(Class<T> clazz,
String id, String instanceId);<br>
<br>
where instanceId is the state associated with the provider (in
case of UserFederationProvider it will be DB ID of
UserFederationProviderModelId). That way, the
UserFederationProviderFactory.create can load the
UserFederationProviderModel (assumption is that RealmModel is
available in KeycloakContext, so
UserFederationProviderFactory.create has access to RealmModel +
providerDatabaseId to load it from DB).<br>
<br>
In the thread, you can see that I've initially proposed something
similar to your proposal, but it's a bit more complex though.
Hopefully going "simple" way and adding just the method with
"instanceId" String argument can solve the issue.<br>
<br>
Marek<br>
<br>
On 10/06/16 01:36, Ariel Carrera wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAFzO_6c=RBb=Xin_G4vDcqeihqQ0x5U4q5G09TRapwCOa2RCuw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>There is not problem! :)</div>
<div>One more thing, I solved the problem of multiple
"federation provider" instances, adding this code to the
DefaultKeycloakSession (and the method definition in
KeycloakSession interface):</div>
<div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">public
<T extends Provider> void
registerProvider(Class<T> clazz, Provider provider,
String id) {<br>
Integer hash = clazz.hashCode() + id.hashCode();<br>
providers.put(hash, provider);<br>
}</blockquote>
<div><br>
And into
MyUserFederationProviderFactory.getInstance(session, model)
something like this:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">public
UserFederationProvider getInstance(KeycloakSession
session, UserFederationProviderModel model){<br>
<span class="" style="white-space:pre">                </span>UserFederationProvider
provider = (UserFederationProvider)
session.getProvider(UserFederationProvider.class,
model.getId());<br>
<span class="" style="white-space:pre">                </span>if
(provider == null){<br>
<span class="" style="white-space:pre">                        </span>lazyInit(session);<br>
<span class="" style="white-space:pre">        </span>
provider = new MyUserFederationProvider(session,
model, config, ......);<br>
<span class="" style="white-space:pre">        </span>
((KeycloakSession)session).registerProvider(UserFederationProvider.class,
provider, model.getId());<br>
<span class="" style="white-space:pre">                </span>};<br>
return provider;<br>
}</blockquote>
<br>
After a few tests and debug it seems to work... creating,
catching, and closing provider instances as expected.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>In future versions as you said, maybe would be better
include a way to instantiate a complex object/provider
instead of doing</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">ProviderFactory.create(KeycloakSession
session) <br>
some kind of method like<br>
ProviderFactory.create(KeycloakSession session, Object...
obj);</blockquote>
<div>and the appropriate method into the KeycloakSession</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><T
extends Provider> T getProvider(Class<T> clazz,
Object... obj);<br>
<T extends Provider> T getProvider(Class<T>
clazz, String id, Object... obj);</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>And why not a map into the keycloakSession to store
some additional context data to share between providers
during same request? It's only a vague idea</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards!</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2016-06-09 17:14 GMT-03:00 Bill
Burke <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bburke@redhat.com" target="_blank">bburke@redhat.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Its gonna be awhile. Its going to be difficult to
make everything both backward compatible and cover
all the current and future use cases we need to
cover. Listen on the dev list. I should post some
info soon on what the new impl will look like.<br>
</p>
<div>
<div class="h5"> <br>
<div>On 6/9/16 3:57 PM, Ariel Carrera wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Yes Bill, exactly! I will waiting
to test it Thanks!<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2016-06-09 16:29
GMT-03:00 Bill Burke <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bburke@redhat.com"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bburke@redhat.com">bburke@redhat.com</a></a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span><br>
<br>
On 6/9/16 2:52 PM, Ariel Carrera wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Hi Bill, is a little expensive for me
because I am creating a new entity
manager to connect with a legacy
database, and creating/enlisting a
transaction per instance.<br>
For example in a simple flow case
where a user needs to click "I forgot
my password" link to recover the
password, there is more than nine or
ten instances created to do this. It's
really not a big problem but I think
that is not necessary and can be
implemented like others spi providers
catched into the keycloak session.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</span> This is good feedback. We need a
way to associate a provider, by name, to
the KeycloakSession. Maybe we just need a
way to associate anything with the
KeycloakSession period.<span><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
In my case, another difficulty is
synchronization between an old
authentication system and keycloak
implemented on demand (there is no
full/partial syncrhonization because
the legacy system is still working and
need to work together for a while).
Also I implemented synchronization
support but at this moment it not
used.<br>
Every time that keycloak needs to
validate a user (isValid) recovered
from the user storage or cache, a
query to the legacy system is made.
Added to this... I need to recover
some attributes and roles changes
produced on the legacy system.... so I
decided to implement a "user
federation cache" with a short term
expiration to improve the performance
with certain synchronization delay
tolerance.<br>
<br>
In a few words I have: a custom User
Federation Provider + on deman
synchronization + a user Federation
Provider Cache (my own cache SPI).<br>
<br>
Maybe an optional spi to obtain a
custom container from infinispan could
be a good choice to add to the new
implementation and provide another one
tool to do things with better
performance.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</span> I think the new model might solve
your caching needs. There will be no
importing by default. This means no
synching, etc. Keycloak will only store
metadata that your user store can't
provide. User Federation Providers will
work just as the default Keycloak user
store and user cache.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Tatú</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div class="gmail_signature"
data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Tatú</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org">keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>