<div dir="ltr">FYI, I sent some questions to the undertow dev-mailing list regarding dynamic vhost configuration:<div><a href="http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/2016-August/001668.html">http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/2016-August/001668.html</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Thomas</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-08-05 21:26 GMT+02:00 Bill Burke <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:bburke@redhat.com" target="_blank">bburke@redhat.com</a>&gt;</span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p>Yeah, on the Client creation page, instead of oidc or saml, you
      can pick &quot;proxied&quot;.  You would specify the URL pattern of incoming
      requests and the URL pattern to forward HTTP requests and bam, it
      just works.  Set up some virtual host table on demand with
      Undertow.<br>
    </p><div><div class="h5">
    <br>
    <div>On 8/5/16 11:36 AM, Thomas Darimont
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Sounds interesting...
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>could you provide a bit more detail about what you have in
          mind?</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Cheers,</div>
        <div>Thomas</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">2016-08-05 16:38 GMT+02:00 Bill Burke <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:bburke@redhat.com" target="_blank">bburke@redhat.com</a>&gt;</span>:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Bump.<br>
            <br>
            I&#39;m going to keep bumping this occasionally to see if
            somebody in the<br>
            community wants to take this on.<br>
            <div>
              <div><br>
                <br>
                On 8/4/16 8:30 PM, Bill Burke wrote:<br>
                &gt; I think we should combine Keycloak Proxy with the
                keycloak server.  When<br>
                &gt; creating a client, you would have an option to
                declare it as a proxied<br>
                &gt; client.  This is way better than what we currently
                have as we woudln&#39;t<br>
                &gt; have to do SAML or OIDC  so it would be more
                performant and it would<br>
                &gt; require no additional setup.<br>
                &gt;<br>
                &gt; ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                &gt; keycloak-dev mailing list<br>
                &gt; <a href="mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
                &gt; <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/keycloak-dev</a><br>
                <br>
                ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                keycloak-dev mailing list<br>
                <a href="mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
                <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/keycloak-dev</a><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div></div></div>

</blockquote></div><br></div>