<div dir="ltr">With a new minor release of Keycloak every 6 weeks that ends up being a lot of dead branches to keep around. Removing them makes it clear they are no longer maintained and stops people from sending PRs to them (this regularly happens).<div><br></div><div>Why not just base your branch of the Final tag?</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 9 September 2016 at 11:59, Thomas Darimont <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:thomas.darimont@googlemail.com" target="_blank">thomas.darimont@googlemail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hello,<div><br></div><div>I think it would have been helpful to announce that on the keycloak-user /-dev mailing-lists and Keycloak blog.</div><div>(In case it was announced - it was IMHO not stressed enough).</div><div><br></div><div>Some folks (including me) based their internal forks of Keycloak on top of a "maintenance branch" like 2.1.x</div><div>expecting to be able to channel compatible fixes / patches into the said custom fork.</div><div><br></div><div>With those maintenance branches now gone - this model no longer works.</div><div>Given that keycloak has now over 500 forks I guess that I'm not the only one who followed that model.</div><div><br></div><div>I would suggest to keep some maintenace branches for previous versions (e.g. 2.1.x) around to enable users </div><div>to upgrade their forks in a timely manner.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Thomas</div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-09-09 11:34 GMT+02:00 Stian Thorgersen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sthorger@redhat.com" target="_blank">sthorger@redhat.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">They where deleted on purpose. 2.2 is about to be released, which means there won't be any more 2.1 or 2.0 releases so these branches are no longer needed.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div>On 9 September 2016 at 10:55, Thomas Darimont <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:thomas.darimont@googlemail.com" target="_blank">thomas.darimont@googlemail.co<wbr>m</a>></span> wrote:<br></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div><div dir="ltr">Hello,<div><br></div><div>just found out that some of the maintenance branches: 2.1.x, 2.0.x are no longer available in in the the keycloak github repository.</div><div><br></div><div>Only the 1.9.x & master branches are left :(</div><div><br></div><div>Did someone accidentally remove those branches?</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Thomas</div></div>
<br></div></div>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
keycloak-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">keycloak-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/keycloak-dev</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>