[keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js

Joshua Bellamy-Henn josh at psidox.com
Thu Jul 31 14:10:52 EDT 2014


I never heard back :P


On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Joshua Bellamy-Henn <josh at psidox.com>
wrote:

> Woot, okay.. just making sure it's working.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I re-registered it after that though
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh at psidox.com>
>> > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
>> > Cc: "Josh" <smysnk at gmail.com>, keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
>> > Sent: Thursday, 31 July, 2014 4:29:49 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>> >
>> > I went through the deletion process so shouldn't be registered anymore.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I think you got the 403 due to it already being registered.
>> > >
>> > > There should be two versions available 1.0-beta3 and 1.0-beta4-pre.
>> Once
>> > > we release 1.0.final it'll be tagged as 1.0. The 1.0-beta3 syntax
>> should
>> > > work as jQuery uses it ;)
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh at psidox.com>
>> > > > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
>> > > > Cc: "Josh" <smysnk at gmail.com>, keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
>> > > > Sent: Wednesday, 30 July, 2014 9:13:21 PM
>> > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>> > > >
>> > > > So I've tried to register this package for you guys using bower:
>> > > >
>> > > > ~/play/keycloak-js-bower    master    14:08:22
>> > > >
>> > > > $ bower register keycloak git://
>> > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
>> > > >
>> > > > bower keycloak#*               resolve git://
>> > > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#*
>> > > >
>> > > > bower keycloak#*              checkout master
>> > > >
>> > > > bower keycloak#*              resolved git://
>> > > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#923dccb251
>> > > >
>> > > > [?] Registering a package will make it installable via the registry
>> (
>> > > > https://bower.herokuapp.com), continue? Yes
>> > > >
>> > > > bower keycloak                register git://
>> > > > github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git
>> > > >
>> > > > bower                         EUNKNOWN Unknown error: 403
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I am afraid this could be due to the version number possibly being
>> in an
>> > > > incorrect format.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Joshua Bellamy-Henn <
>> josh at psidox.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I removed the "keycloak" package, the name should be open for
>> > > registration
>> > > > > now.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Still bit skeptical it will accept anything other than "x.x.x"
>> notation
>> > > > > for versioning but give it a try. :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > - Josh
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Stian Thorgersen <
>> stian at redhat.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Have you contacted the Bower guys to get this changed yet?
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> By the way we're going to stick with the same versioning that we
>> use
>> > > for
>> > > > >> Keycloak except we'll remove -final from the final release. So
>> > > versions
>> > > > >> would be:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> 1.0-beta4
>> > > > >> 1.0-rc1
>> > > > >> 1.0
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> That should mean that versions such as ">=1.0" will work, and
>> will
>> > > only
>> > > > >> use stable versions, while if someone wants to use a beta or rc
>> they
>> > > can
>> > > > >> explicitly specify the version.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > >> > From: "Josh" <smysnk at gmail.com>
>> > > > >> > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
>> > > > >> > Cc: keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
>> > > > >> > Sent: Thursday, 3 July, 2014 4:46:09 PM
>> > > > >> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > I do think there is a problem using that version format, I
>> think I
>> > > > >> tried it
>> > > > >> > originally and bower was having none of it.  This could be
>> because
>> > > they
>> > > > >> use
>> > > > >> > version for auto upgrade purposes, where one can use a "~"
>> > > character to
>> > > > >> > prefix the version to allow upgrades in version minors in the
>> > > bower.json
>> > > > >> > file.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > eg.
>> > > > >> >   "dependencies": {
>> > > > >> >     "keycloak": "~0.3.12"
>> > > > >> >   },
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > I have to admit I've been pulled to the dark side a little
>> bit, it
>> > > do
>> > > > >> enjoy
>> > > > >> > npm / bower for doing javascript type build processes
>> (sometimes a
>> > > > >> > necessary evil).  I was never a a fan of 'grunt' but found that
>> > > 'gulp'
>> > > > >> is
>> > > > >> > much better.  I have a hybrid build process in my java apps
>> where I
>> > > > >> > sometimes break out of maven to execute some gulp build
>> processes.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > But I understand for project like keycloak 'npm / gulp' adds a
>> lot
>> > > of
>> > > > >> > complexity to build process and is not desirable.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > I'll talk to the bower guys to get keycloak switched over to
>> your
>> > > fork
>> > > > >> :D
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Stian Thorgersen <
>> stian at redhat.com>
>> > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > I've pulled in your stuff to
>> > > > >> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > I'd prefer the versions to match with Keycloak versions
>> > > (1.0-beta-2,
>> > > > >> > > 1.0-beta-3, 1.0-final). Do you know if that'll be a problem?
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > Also, I'm going to add minification of keycloak.js to our
>> Maven
>> > > build.
>> > > > >> > > We'll need it there as well + we're mainly Java/Maven guys ;)
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > >> > > > From: "Josh" <smysnk at gmail.com>
>> > > > >> > > > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
>> > > > >> > > > Cc: keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
>> > > > >> > > > Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2014 10:38:44 PM
>> > > > >> > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > Looks like it's a manual process at the moment to get
>> registry
>> > > > >> moved to a
>> > > > >> > > > different github endpont.  Let me know when you have the
>> project
>> > > > >> setup
>> > > > >> > > and
>> > > > >> > > > I'll contact the bower guys.
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > - Josh
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh <smysnk at gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > You bet, I actually had the thought that it would be
>> better as
>> > > > >> part of
>> > > > >> > > the
>> > > > >> > > > > release cycle.  I'll have to figure out how to transfer
>> bower
>> > > > >> > > repositories
>> > > > >> > > > > because there was no login required to register a bower
>> repo
>> > > and
>> > > > >> > > currently
>> > > > >> > > > > I have taken "keycloak" which would be optimal for the
>> > > project.
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stian Thorgersen <
>> > > > >> stian at redhat.com>
>> > > > >> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >> Hi Josh,
>> > > > >> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > >> That's great - thanks for contributing this. I would
>> like to
>> > > > >> transfer
>> > > > >> > > > >> this to https://github.com/keycloak though, I hope your
>> > > happy
>> > > > >> with
>> > > > >> > > that.
>> > > > >> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > >> Thanks,
>> > > > >> > > > >> Stian
>> > > > >> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > >> > > > >> > From: "Josh" <smysnk at gmail.com>
>> > > > >> > > > >> > To: keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
>> > > > >> > > > >> > Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 6:30:02 PM
>> > > > >> > > > >> > Subject: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > >> > Hi guys,
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > >> > I have created a little github project to make
>> keycloak.js
>> > > > >> > > available to
>> > > > >> > > > >> bower
>> > > > >> > > > >> > package manager .
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > >> > Project here:
>> > > > >> > > > >> > https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > >> > Usage:
>> > > > >> > > > >> > $ bower install keycloak
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > >> > - Josh
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > >> > _______________________________________________
>> > > > >> > > > >> > keycloak-user mailing list
>> > > > >> > > > >> > keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
>> > > > >> > > > >> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>> > > > >> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/attachments/20140731/5397db96/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the keycloak-user mailing list