[keycloak-user] LiveOak integration with Keycloak

[Dean Peterson]

Perfect, thank you!


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Marek Posolda <mposolda at redhat.com> wrote:

> I've added some "quick and dirty" instructions on how to use separate
> Keycloak from your Liveoak https://github.com/mposolda/
> mposolda.github.io/blob/master/tmp/Separate-Keycloak.md . I will try to
> properly document somewhere later, until then you can use those temporary
> instructions. You will also need latest LiveOak master.
>
> Let me know if it suits your needs or if seeing some issues...
>
> Marek
>
>
> On 2.9.2014 09:37, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>
>> To make LiveOak as easy as possible to use we wanted it to work out of
>> the box, so we include a ready bootstrapped Keycloak.
>>
>> It's quite easy to remove the bootstrap Keycloak server and use your own.
>> Marek is going to upgrade Keycloak in LiveOak soon and he'll add some
>> documentation on how to use an external Keycloak server.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>>> From: "Dean Peterson" <peterson.dean at gmail.com>
>>> To: keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 2 September, 2014 3:50:54 AM
>>> Subject: [keycloak-user] LiveOak integration with Keycloak
>>>
>>> I am wondering about the KeycloakApplication class the LiveOak project
>>> seems
>>> to be using to extend Keycloak for their framework. I really like what
>>> LiveOak is doing but I am not able to understand why they would couple
>>> everything to a custom version of Keycloak. I want to have a separate
>>> Keycloak server that handles security for whatever applications I have.
>>> It
>>> seems their decision to include Keycloak in the deployment of LiveOak
>>> prevents me from deploying multiple LiveOak domain models on separate
>>> servers. Every LiveOak will have its own instance of Keycloak. I am
>>> asking
>>> here because it seems Stian has had a hand in the creation of LiveOak
>>> and I
>>> was hoping he might see this and shed some light on the subject. There is
>>> little documentation on the KeycloakApplication class. Is that used to
>>> easily extend Keycloak and embed it into other frameworks? Doesn't that
>>> defeat the purpose of Security As A Service? Any ideas how I might
>>> decouple
>>> Keycloak from LiveOak?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> keycloak-user mailing list
>>> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-user mailing list
>> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/attachments/20140906/10570f79/attachment.html