[keycloak-user] Best practice for database access in a keycloak custom provider?

Scott Rossillo srossillo at smartling.com
Thu Oct 8 14:56:55 EDT 2015


One plus of the federation provider approach is that it requires zero downtime. Users start migrating on login rather than shutting down the legacy system, importing users, and bringing things back up.

Scott Rossillo
Smartling | Senior Software Engineer
srossillo at smartling.com

 <http://www.sigstr.com/>
> On Oct 8, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> For the database in a user federation provider you can use JpaConnectionProvider, but then you have to modify our persistence.xml. Alternatively you can create your own EntityManagerFactory within your UserFederationProviderFactory. Downside to that is that you won't share the connection (and 1pc transaction). We could improve on this in the future as it's a bit clunky.
> 
> The other alternative is that we plan to introduce a password hashing spi. With that you can provide the implementation that can hash passwords according to how you have them saved in your current database. Then you can import the users directly into Keycloak and forget about the user federation provider. To import the users you can either export them from your db to a json file (currently you need a full realm file, but we are looking at doing partial import/export now and with that you'll be able to import a json file with users only into an existing realm). Alternatively you can use the rest admin api to import them.
> 
> On 8 October 2015 at 10:17, Valerij Timofeev <valerij.timofeev at gmail.com <mailto:valerij.timofeev at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Exactly. 
> 
> Plain text passwords are unknown, so the "custom user federation provider" approach, suggested by Scott Rossillo in the keycloak-user Digest, Vol 22, Issue 18, seems to be feasible:
> - User federation provider searches for the user in the legacy user storage on the 1st login. 
> - If the user is found and the password legacy hash matches the value in the legacy user storage, user credential is updated in the Keycloak storage and federation link is removed then (see code snippet below).
> 
> My question is, what would be the best way to access legacy database from within a Keycloak custom provider? 
> JPA datasource  for the legacy database is available on the same application server, where the Keycloak server runs (EAP 6.4.3).
> 
> 
> @Override
>     public boolean validCredentials(RealmModel realm, UserModel user, List<UserCredentialModel> input)
>     {
>         for (UserCredentialModel cred : input)
>         {
>             if (cred.getType().equals(UserCredentialModel.PASSWORD))
>             {
> 
>                 return this.updateCredential(realm, user, cred);
> 
>             } else
>             {
>                 return false; // invalid cred type
>             }
>         }
>         return false;
>     }
>  
>     private boolean updateCredential(RealmModel realm, UserModel user, UserCredentialModel cred)
>     {
>         String password = properties.getProperty(user.getUsername());
>         if (password == null)
>             return false;
>  
>         String encodedPassword = Digest.createPassword(cred.getValue());
>         boolean isPasswordOK = password.equals(encodedPassword);
>         if (isPasswordOK)
>         {
>             // save password
>             session.userStorage().getUserById(user.getId(), realm).updateCredential(cred);
>             // break the federation link
>             session.userStorage().getUserById(user.getId(), realm).setFederationLink(null);
>         }
>         return isPasswordOK;
>     }
> 
> 2015-10-08 5:57 GMT+02:00 Stian Thorgersen <sthorger at redhat.com <mailto:sthorger at redhat.com>>:
> Do you want to permanently import the users into the Keycloak database?
> 
> On 7 October 2015 at 18:37, Valerij Timofeev <valerij.timofeev at gmail.com <mailto:valerij.timofeev at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> in order to import users having encrypted passwords from existing user storage I'm implementing user federation provider based on the keycloak example keycloak-examples-1.5.0.Final/providers/federation-provider.
> Additionally I considered hints provided by Scott Rossillo in the keycloak-user Digest, Vol 22, Issue 18
> Above example works properly when retrieving users from a properties file. The next step in the implementation would be access to the database where users data is stored.
>  
> My question: What would be the best practice for accessing database from a custom keycloak provider?
> 
> Something like this?
> 
> // KeycloakSession
> session.getProvider(JpaConnectionProvider.class, "myTS")
>                 .getEntityManager()
>                 .createQuery("SELECT... ?
> 
> 
> keycloak-server.json:
> "connectionsJpa": {
>         "default": {
>             "dataSource": "java:jboss/datasources/KeycloakDS",
>             "databaseSchema": "update"
>         },
>       "myTS": {
>             "dataSource": "java:jboss/datasources/myTsDS"
>         }    }
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Valerij Timofeev
> Software Engineer
> Trusted Shops GmbH
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org <mailto:keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/attachments/20151008/422132f6/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the keycloak-user mailing list