[keycloak-user] Naming of the keycloak proxy/generic adapter

[Schuster Sebastian (INST/ESY1)]

My vote goes to OIDC Adapter. It just supports OIDC, that's what the name says. I don't think adding something like "generic" adds meaningful information. The shorter, the better... :)

Best regards,
Sebastian

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards

Dr.-Ing.  Sebastian Schuster

Engineering and Support (INST/ESY1) 
Bosch Software Innovations GmbH | Ullsteinstr. 128 | 12109 Berlin | GERMANY | www.bosch-si.com
Tel. +49 30 726112-485 | Fax +49 30 726112-100 | Sebastian.Schuster at bosch-si.com

Sitz: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg; HRB 148411 B 
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Dr.-Ing. Thorsten Lücke; Geschäftsführung: Dr. Stefan Ferber, Michael Hahn 




-----Original Message-----
From: keycloak-user-bounces at lists.jboss.org <keycloak-user-bounces at lists.jboss.org> On Behalf Of John Doyle
Sent: Mittwoch, 15. August 2018 16:29
To: keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
Subject: [keycloak-user] Naming of the keycloak proxy/generic adapter

We've begun calling the keycloak proxy the generic adapter. I think this is a good move, there's too many proxies. My concern with 'generic adapter' is that it's not specific enough. Users could be justified in thinking that they can proxy SAML with it in addition to OIDC. I propose that we included OIDC in the name to make it clear.

Some Possibilities:
OIDC Adapter
Generic OIDC Adapter
Universal OIDC Adapter
Standalone OIDC Adapter

Other ideas or preferences?

~jd
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user