[keycloak-user] shared UMA 2.0 resource & scope based policies

Marek Lindner mareklindner at neomailbox.ch
Wed Jan 16 06:29:51 EST 2019


Hi Pedro,

> Which version of Keycloak are you using?

I am using 4.8.2 Final (see attached screenshot).


> I tried to reproduce the problem using upstream and the evaluation tool
> looks correct by reporting only album:view. The same goes if obtaining an
> RPT from the token endpoint.

Can you share a screenshot of your evaluation tool result ? Does it correctly 
DENY access ?

I can also share my server config json if this helps.

Thanks,
Marek

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: keycloak_info.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12060 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/attachments/20190116/c1b9ebb3/attachment-0001.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/attachments/20190116/c1b9ebb3/attachment-0001.bin 


More information about the keycloak-user mailing list