<div dir="ltr"><div>Hi Marek,<br><br></div>my comments inline:<br><div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Marek Posolda <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mposolda@redhat.com" target="_blank">mposolda@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>How much clients you have in mind? <br>
<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I guess 100-1000 would be realistic. But more may come later. <br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><div>
Theoretically there is no any limit. At least at database level.
Fact is that we didn't try to test admin console UI with very big
number of clients. Feel free to create JIRA if you're seeing
issues.<br>
<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Thanks. Before doing this, i just want to be sure that i'm on the right path and there are no alternatives. For instance, i've also considered creating a new realm per machine but this won't work either. A user's identity should be global but also have access to selected machine(s). I think that concept can work only within a single realm.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><div>
Another approach is to design your deployment so the number of
clients is not too big. For example when adding new "machine" you
can reuse already created clients (not sure if it's the approach
which works for you, just a possible hint...)<br>
</div></div></blockquote><div> <br>Unfortunately that won't work either. :-(. We need those clients and their respective machines to be in place and operational.<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><div>
Marek<div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br><br></div><div>Anyway, thanks for the help Marek!<br><br><br></div><div>Regards<br><br></div><div>Orestis<br></div><div> <br><br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><div><div><div class="h5">
<br>
On 30.6.2015 09:50, Orestis Tsakiridis wrote:<br>
</div></div></div>
<blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>Hi all,<br>
<br>
</div>
Is there a limit in the maximum number of clients/applications
in single realm supported by keycloak? <br>
<br>
I can see that the keycloak admin UI is not built with a big
number in mind. For instance, when assigning "Client roles" to
a realm user there is a dropdown with all clients/applications
in the realm. I guess this shouldn't grow too big to be
usuable.<br>
<br>
</div>
I'm working on a scenario where i need to implement
authorization in a system where new machines (and their
respective keycloak applications) will be added on the fly. So
i'm worying about what will happen if the number starts to grow.<br>
<div>
<div><br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Thanks<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
</div></div><pre>_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
<a href="mailto:keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
keycloak-user mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org">keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div>