<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/01/16 16:46, Mai Zi wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1768634302.388639.1452008793167.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff;
font-family:garamond, new york, times, serif;font-size:14px">
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1451963959903_13972">Hi, there,</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1451963959903_13972"> </div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1451963959903_13972">Suppose we have a
wildfly app server with adapter 1.11 version, will talk to
keyclok 1.7.0 final , is it possible ?</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Not sure I understand. 1.11 Keycloak version is not released yet,
the latest keycloak version is 1.7.0. And adapters are released
together with Keycloak server, so latest adapter version is 1.7.0 as
well.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1768634302.388639.1452008793167.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff;
font-family:garamond, new york, times, serif;font-size:14px">
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1451963959903_13972"><br>
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1451963959903_13972">In other words, do we
need to upgrade the adapter to 1.7.0 ?</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Theoretically it will work and you will be able to use Keycloak
1.6.0 adapter with Keycloak 1.7.0 server. However we are not testing
this scenario AFAIK. There might be some fixes in protocol, token
format etc, which will cause that adapter version X won't work with
Keycloak server version X+1 . In other words, it's always safer to
use same version of keycloak server and keycloak adapter.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1768634302.388639.1452008793167.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff;
font-family:garamond, new york, times, serif;font-size:14px">
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1451963959903_13972"><br>
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1451963959903_13972">If this case , our
wildfly is 8.0, it is safe to use the latest 1.7.0 adapter?</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Yes, we have wildfly8 adapter. See "<a
href="http://www.redhat.com/j/elqNow/elqRedir.htm?ref=http://downloads.jboss.org/keycloak/1.7.0.Final/adapters/keycloak-oidc/keycloak-wf8-adapter-dist-1.7.0.Final.zip">keycloak-wf8-adapter-dist-1.7.0.Final.zip</a>"
under
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://keycloak.jboss.org/keycloak/downloads.html?dir=0%3Dadapters/keycloak-oidc%3B">http://keycloak.jboss.org/keycloak/downloads.html?dir=0%3Dadapters/keycloak-oidc%3B</a><br>
<br>
Marek<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1768634302.388639.1452008793167.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff;
font-family:garamond, new york, times, serif;font-size:14px">
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1451963959903_13972"><br>
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1451963959903_13972"><br>
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1451963959903_13972">TIA.</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1451963959903_13972"><br>
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1451963959903_13972">Mai</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org">keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>