<html><body><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div>Il 17/05/2016 03:26, Ron Sigal ha
scritto:<br></div><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><blockquote cite="mid:9e2969ae-02d3-5cee-e47a-ce62ec75424a@redhat.com">
Hi Rebecca,<br><div><br></div>
Following up on our discussion during today's meeting, changing
that constructor would introduce a new behavior that may break
someone's code. That was the point of the discussion in
RESTEASY-975. So we have to come to some decision about how to
manage changes like this. Should we have, as you suggested, a
3.0.x branch that maintains the current behavior, so that a change
like this can be introduced into master (or whatever ends up
serving as master for 3.1.x)?</blockquote>
I'm fine with this. Let's use the minor version change for this. On
a related topic, we should keep track of changes like this so that
we can later prepare migration notes (when we'll be ready for
releasing next minor).</blockquote><div><br></div><div>+100 for migration notes :)<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><br><div><br></div>
Cheers<br>
Alessio<br><pre class="moz-signature">--
Alessio Soldano
Web Service Lead, JBoss</pre><br>_______________________________________________<br>resteasy-dev mailing list<br>resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org<br>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev<br></blockquote><div><br></div></div></body></html>