<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 01/06/2016 20:16, Ron Sigal ha
scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:c26971bd-dcb0-8aeb-4f75-1a4702ce7595@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1662693582.1399492.1464789426729.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
ARQ + Undertow know each other: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://arquillian.org/modules/undertow-embedded-container-adapter/">http://arquillian.org/modules/undertow-embedded-container-adapter/</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
My first inclination, like Weinan's, was to think that running
everything in Wildfly was pretty heavy, but if we just start
Wildfly once, that's not so bad.</blockquote>
Right, that's what I meant saying that it depends on how you
implement the solution. In practice, we might end up needing more
than just a single WFLY instance (perhaps because we need different
container configurations for different types of tests), but the
number of instances should really be limited (let's say less than
5?).<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:c26971bd-dcb0-8aeb-4f75-1a4702ce7595@redhat.com"
type="cite"> After all, that's what the TCK does, as well as the
new qe TS.</blockquote>
And the JBossWS testsuite ;)<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:c26971bd-dcb0-8aeb-4f75-1a4702ce7595@redhat.com"
type="cite"> One problem I still have is that, when I'm working on
a problem, I MUCH prefer running tests in an embedded container
like tjws or Undertow.</blockquote>
Not sure what the preference is based on, but if that's because you
don't want to manually start the container, etc... Arquillian does
that for you.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:c26971bd-dcb0-8aeb-4f75-1a4702ce7595@redhat.com"
type="cite"> I guess I could just write a standalone test and then
turn it into an arquillian test when I'm done. But if Arquillian
works with Undertow, which I didn't know, that might be the best
of all worlds.</blockquote>
I've never tried this, but afaiu yes it works with Undertow.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:c26971bd-dcb0-8aeb-4f75-1a4702ce7595@redhat.com"
type="cite"> I'm a little worried though about the time it takes
Arquillian to create a WAR, which isn't insignificant ...<br>
</blockquote>
It's not that bad after all; btw, once you have all tests as
arquillian ones and you ensure they do not make assumptions on the
server being there just for each of them (which is also good), you
can most likely make the testsuite execution concurrent and run
multiple tests at the same time.<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
Alessio<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Alessio Soldano
Web Service Lead, JBoss</pre>
</body>
</html>