<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 06/02/2016 05:47 AM, Rostislav
Svoboda wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1132268857.1813783.1464860824128.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: #000000">
<hr id="zwchr">
<blockquote style="border-left:2px solid
#1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 01/06/2016 19:27, Ron Sigal ha
scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:e7ac7b97-15da-9fca-f6d4-938238a3f951@redhat.com">
<p>On 06/01/2016 04:16 AM, Alessio Soldano wrote:<br>
</p>
<blockquote cite="mid:574E99F6.6080808@redhat.com">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 01/06/2016 03:14, Ron
Sigal ha scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:2f4e5535-5266-3897-e96c-5ab51d814fab@redhat.com">
<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>After slogging through as many bug JIRAs as possible
for 3.0.17.Final, I felt like I needed to do something
different for a while, so I started looking at
non-blocking IO for JAX-RS 2.1. One of the issues I
ran into is the servlet version problem. Even though
resteasy-jaxrs declares a dependency on servlet 3.1,
its dependency on tjws brings in servlet 2.5, which
gets in the way of using servlet 3.1. I've done some
refactoring:</p>
<p> 1) moved everything related to tjws from
resteasy-jaxrs to tjws</p>
<p> 2) moved all tests (except i18n tests) from
resteasy-jaxrs to resteasy-jaxrs-testsuite (so
resteasy-jaxrs doesn't depend on tjws)<br>
</p>
<p> 3) removed the dependency of resteasy-jaxrs on tjws<br>
</p>
<p> 4) created a dependency of tjws on resteasy-jaxrs</p>
<p>I thought I'd ask for comments before I create a pull
request. Two points come to mind:</p>
<p>1) Originally, resteasy-jaxrs-testsuite was created
to hold tests specifically related to JAX-RS 2.0
(hence the nextgen packages). The plan was to upgrade
all of the old tests to use JAX-RS 2.0 stuff like the
new client framework, but it never happened. This
might be a good time to do that.<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
+1, we should try to get rid of all those warnings about
old client stuff in the build. And given we're working on
a new minor and that stuff was deprecated in 3.0.x, we
could actually think about removing the old client
framework.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Given that we have some large pieces pieces ready to
deprecate (old client framework, TJWS, old validation (see
my previous note on mailing list), maybe we should do a
3.0.18.Final release in which all this stuff is deprecated
so that we can start 3.1.0.Final with a clean slate. Just a
thought.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yeah, that would be nice.We should then backport <a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://github.com/resteasy/Resteasy/pull/821/commits/db988a936fef4a7c602d5292a3e371eb8fe5dbf9"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/resteasy/Resteasy/pull/821/commits/db988a936fef4a7c602d5292a3e371eb8fe5dbf9">https://github.com/resteasy/Resteasy/pull/821/commits/db988a936fef4a7c602d5292a3e371eb8fe5dbf9</a></a>
to the 3.0.x branch as well as the commit that will deprecate
the old validation stuff. Perhaps the 3.0.18.Final release
should also include few bug fixes, so we could wait some weeks
and see if there's anything really relevant to be backported
there (and better justify the release) ;-)</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Don't forget that EAP 7.0.z will need RESTEasy 3.0.z
releases and there are quite strict rules for CP stream to
limit scope and prevent regressions. Things which should be
fixed must be approved via CP triage and are usually proposed
by GSS.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>So 3.0.18.Final should be release for deprecation of stuff
++ bug fixes requested via EAP 7.0.z CP stream.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Ok, so we could wait a little to see if any EAP 7.0.z bugs show up.
I think I have one to propose, in fact, but I have to look a little
more closely.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1132268857.1813783.1464860824128.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: #000000">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Rostislav<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-left:2px solid
#1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:e7ac7b97-15da-9fca-f6d4-938238a3f951@redhat.com">
<blockquote cite="mid:574E99F6.6080808@redhat.com"><br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:2f4e5535-5266-3897-e96c-5ab51d814fab@redhat.com">
<p>2) I know we've talked about what to do with tjws,
but I don't know if we reached a conclusion. This
would be a good time to deprecate it, if we're going
to do that.</p>
</blockquote>
+1, sure.<br>
<br>
I'd be glad to review your PR on this. It should be the
first step to revisiting the testsuite to default to using
WFLY as container.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I created RESTEASY-1410 "Segregate TJWS from resteasy-jaxrs"
and PR <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://github.com/resteasy/Resteasy/pull/821"
target="_blank">https://github.com/resteasy/Resteasy/pull/821</a>.
Since you agree that we should deprecate TJWS, I'll do one
more commit in which all of the TJWS classes are
@deprecated.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Cool thanks.<br>
I'm testing the PR on top of current HEAD and merging if
everything is fine (and I think it is)<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
Alessio<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature">--
Alessio Soldano
Web Service Lead, JBoss</pre>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
resteasy-dev mailing list<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org">resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev</a><br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
resteasy-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org">resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
My company's smarter than your company (unless you work for Red Hat)</pre>
</body>
</html>